Day 160: Now or never

Would you do work with business impact now, knowing that it could require a complete reworking (or worse, become obsolete) further down the road?

So we could improve an import feature to save the users time now (let’s call this “problem A”). But at the same time, we’re re-evaluating the product construct and are considering a reasonably big change to solve another “problem B”. This change would definitely impact problem A – at minimum altering how to engineer the solution.

Logically, you would solve problem B first. After all, when B is done, A is either irrelevant or requires a completely different solution. Otherwise, you’d be wasting resources building something that may one day be re-written.

But when you don’t have enough information to resolve B – which means it will drag on – is doing “double-work” the lesser of two evils?

Hey, maybe one day, problem B might itself become irrelevant.

So between the more waterfall style thinking and the agile approach, which would you choose?


I jumped from Product Marketing to Product Management at Zalora recently. These posts represent a journal of my learnings and reflections – you can keep track of my journey by joining the mailing list here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s